Book
Philosophy of Science: Very Short Introduction
A concise tour of the central questions in philosophy of science—what science is, how scientific inference works, what explanation means, whether theories describe reality, how science changes, and how it relates to its critics.
What it’s about
Samir Okasha's Very Short Introduction distills the core debates of the philosophy of science into an accessible yet rigorous guide. Beginning with the historical origins of modern science in the scientific revolution, it works through the nature of scientific inference (induction, Hume's problem, inference to the best explanation, causation, and Bayesian probability), the structure of scientific explanation (Hempel's covering law model and its causal alternatives), the realism/anti-realism debate, Kuhn's account of paradigm shifts and scientific revolutions, philosophical puzzles within specific sciences (space and time, biological species, the modularity of mind), and finally the social, religious, and value-laden critiques of science. Anyone seeking to understand how science actually works—and why its apparent certainties rest on subtle and contested foundations—will find this an ideal entry point.
The through-line
- Who it’s for
- A curious reader—student, scientist, or thoughtful layperson—who wants to understand what science really is and how it actually works.
- The problem
- Science presents itself as the paradigm of rational, objective knowledge, but its methods and foundations are poorly understood and harder to justify than they appear. The reader feels uncertain about whether the confident claims of science rest on solid ground, and unequipped to think critically about them.
- The plan
- Learn how modern science arose and why demarcating it is hard.
- Understand the logic of scientific inference and its limits.
- Grasp what makes an explanation genuinely scientific.
- Weigh whether theories describe reality or merely predict observations.
- Reconsider scientific change through Kuhn's paradigms.
- The payoff
- The reader can analyse scientific claims with philosophical sophistication, distinguishing what is established from what is assumed. · The reader appreciates both the power and the contested foundations of science, fostering rational, balanced judgement.
See our guide
- The Bicycle Guide to Deal With Burnout, Stress And Turnover →
- The Bicycle Guide to Make A Decision Your Biases Won't Wreck →
- The Bicycle Guide to Change A Behaviour That Won't Budge →
- The Bicycle Guide to Influence People Without Manipulating Them →
- The Bicycle Guide to Motivate People Without Bribing Them →
- The Bicycle Guide to Build A Team People Speak Up In →
Featured in these guides
- The Bicycle Guide to Deal With Burnout, Stress And Turnover →Cited source
- The Bicycle Guide to Make A Decision Your Biases Won't Wreck →Cited source
- The Bicycle Guide to Change A Behaviour That Won't Budge →Cited source
- The Bicycle Guide to Influence People Without Manipulating Them →Cited source
- The Bicycle Guide to Motivate People Without Bribing Them →Cited source
- The Bicycle Guide to Build A Team People Speak Up In →Cited source
Co-cited books
- Obedience to Authority (Perennial Classics)
- Predictably Irrational, Revised and Expanded Edition · Dan Ariely
- The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
- Thinking, Fast and Slow · Daniel Kahneman
- Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition
- The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil
- Fundamentals of Social Research · Mutea Rukwaru
- The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil